Evaluation of the additive effect of domperidone on patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease; a randomized double blind clinical trial

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease [GERD] is a common problem with annoying symptoms. It is associated with negative impact on quality of life. Prokinetic agents may be used in combination with acid suppression agents as an adjunctive in patients with GERD refractory to proton pump inhibitors [PPI] therapy, rather than as sole treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of combination of PPI with domperidone [a prokinetic agent] compared with PPI alone in the treatment of patients with refractory GERD

Methods: This study was a double blind clinical trial on 29 patients with GERD refractory to PPI during the period of one month. By randomization, the patients were divided into two groups. Group A was treated by pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily and domperidone three times a day for a month, while group B was treated by pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily and placebo three times a day. In this study endoscopy was performed to evaluate the prevalence of erosive esophagitis, non-erosive reflux, and hiatal hernia. Manometry was conducted to study the prevalence of dysmotility. GERD symptom questionnaires including the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale [GSRS], Carlson Dennett, and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 health survey [SF36] were used before and after treatment for screening GERD and assessing treatment response

Results: There were 17 [58.62%] women and 12 [41.37%] men. The prevalence of erosive esophagitis and non-erosive reflux, was 10.34% and 89.66%, respectively. There was a significant difference comparing reflux symptoms before and after treatment between the two groups according to reflux and Carlson Dennett questionnaires. At the end of the study, symptoms of reflux significantly improved by treatment. Although, the quality of life questionnaire scores improved by treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in response to treatment between the two groups

Conclusion: In this research, we showed that adding domperidone to PPI could not make any improvement in patients with refractory reflux regarding the quality of life and improving the symptoms

efficacy of levofloxacin-based triple therapy for helicobacter pylori eradication after failure with clarithromycin-containing regimens

Background: Clinical trials and meta-analyses have reported about 20% failure rates in first-line Helicobacter pylori [H. pylori] eradication. This reflects the need for effective second-line eradication regimens

Materials and Methods: 61 patients with H. pylori infection who had failed previous non-bismuth clarithromycin-containing first line therapies entered the study. They were given a 14-day levofloxacin-containing triple regimen consisted of pantoprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1gr, and levofloxacin 500mg, each given twice daily. Eight weeks after the treatment, H. pylori eradication was assessed by 14C-urea breath test

Results: All patients completed the study. The eradication rate was 91.8% [95% confidence interval = 84.9% - 98.6%] by both intention to treat and per-protocol analyses. Side effects of therapy were reported by eight patients [13.1%], but they were severe in only two patients [3.2%]

Conclusion: According to the high H. pylori eradication rate and the very low rate of severe adverse effects, levofloxacin-containing triple therapy seems to be a suitable second-line option in case of previous failure by clarithromycin-containing therapies. We suggest further studies with shorter duration of treatment or lower dose of levofloxacin